XEP33 says that a server should have a limit for the maximum number of addresses allowed on a single packet: the limit SHOULD be more than 20 and less than 100.
That limit is easy to implement on the receiving party. But what happens with the sender? How many addresses can a sender put on each packet? If it puts too many, the packet will be rejected. If it puts too few, it is not profiting of XEP33 as much as it could do.
On the current version of XEP33, remote servers allow as few as 20 and as much as 100 addresses. This means that a sender have to reduce to the minimum common in order to not get rejects: it can only send as much as 20 addresses on each packet.
If we already know that 20 is the maximum limit in practice, then why bother telling some admins that they can put 30, 40 or more on their servers? Nobody will send more than 20 addresses on each packet!
I can see three solutions to the current situation:
- Unlimited addresses
- Strict limit
- Configurable limit, and method to inform
#1: Unlimited addresses
Don't force any limit at all: XEP33 servers must accept a packet with as many addresses as the sender desires. The limit in this case is not imposed by XEP33, but by the server implementation, which usually limits the size of any XMPP packet.
This solution is the easier of all them to implement.
This solution can be potentially damaging. For example ejabberd limits the size of any received packet to 64KB. A spammer could construct stanzas with 4KB of message, and 60KB of destination addresses.
In general, the size of an 'address' element is around 50 bytes.
In practice, this allows a spammer to send one packet to a Jabber server that implements XEP33, and the server itself will send 4KB of spam to 1200 local accounts. And all this damage with just a single XMPP stanza.
#2: Strict limit
Define a strict limit on XEP33, and all senders and receivers must agree. For example 100. This way all Jabber servers, components and clients that implement XEP33 know how much addresses can be send on a packet.
This solution is easy to understand and to implement.
However, it limits the power of XEP33 on certain situations. For example, on a restricted and controlled private network where spammers are not an issue, it may be preferable to allow up to 1000 addresses.
#3: Configurable limit, and method to inform
Allow a configurable limit on the protocol, for example between 20 and 100, like currently. And describe a method for senders to know which limit is applied on each destination server.
This solution is the hardest to implement: it makes XEP33 more complex, and requires more code on both senders and receivers. The benefit of this solution is that it allows XEP33 to adapt to different network conditions.
Some topics that must be addressed if this solution is used:
- The disco#info response that reports XEP33 support could indicate the limit:
<feature var='http://jabber.org/protocol/address' limit=50 />
- If a stanza is sent with more than the allowed addresses, the resulting error stanza informs of the limit:
<not-acceptable limit=50 />
Until a definitive solution is adopted for this problem, I implemented in ejabberd the easiest possible solution ever: never send a packet with more than 20 addresses. If this limit is reached, simply send several packets with smaller list of destination addresses.